Justin Fox, Columnist

The Positive Side of Licensing Barbers

Imposing requirements on certain kinds of work could actually be a better deal for consumers.

More choices, better haircuts.

Photographer: Darren McCollester/Getty Images for Boston Children's Hospital
Lock
This article is for subscribers only.

Occupational licensing, Milton Friedman declared in his 1962 classic "Capitalism and Freedom," is an affront to freedom and a check on economic dynamism -- a modern, Western equivalent of medieval guilds and Indian castes. "Licensure," he wrote, "almost inevitably becomes a tool in the hands of a special producer group to obtain a monopoly position at the expense of the rest of the public."

At that time, about 5 percent of employed Americans needed government-issued licenses to do their jobs.1498249727954 When the government survey takers asked workers in 2016 if they held a currently active occupational license or certificate, 25 percent said they did. The most licensed occupational category was the one that had been the main target of Friedman's wrath in 1961 -- health-care practitioners. But lots of workers in lots of other fields now have licenses, too: